Quite some time ago, we did an extensive review on the Direct Action Spitfire MK2 plate carrier and showcased its incredible configuration options.
In 2021, Direct Action has come out with an entirely new ultralightweight line, including the Bearcat system. In this post, we’ll cover the reasoning behind the Bearcat plate carrier, what’s different about it compared to the Spitfire MK2, and most importantly, why someone might choose the Bearcat over the legendary Spitfire system.
But before we dig into this subject if you want quality gear and like our work, please support us by buying over our store.
OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH DIRECT ACTION
A quick disclosure: we started using Direct Action products a few years ago and loved them so much that we became an official retailer. While we actively stock their products, if you have trouble finding some, our shop allows you to have them made on demand. This plate carrier was given to us by Direct Action, along with some accessories, solely for testing and making this review. There was no financial involvement, ensuring our objective approach to this review.
Ultralightweight Line:
Bearcat vs. Spitfire MK2
The ultralightweight line's core idea is simple: every gram saved helps you carry more ammunition, tools, or simply lighten your load. This is crucial as missions can last from several hours to a few days where weight is a critical factor.
Weight Comparison
The Bearcat system without plates weighs 290 grams, compared to the Spitfire MK2’s 380 grams—a 90-gram difference. This difference means you can carry seven more 9mm rounds with the Bearcat before reaching the Spitfire’s weight.
In a full setup (plate carrier, cummerbund front panel, and side radio wing), both weigh 850 grams, so what gives the Bearcat an edge?
Design Overhaul
The Bearcat's design differs significantly from the Spitfire MK2, both in construction and features:
Material: The Bearcat uses lightweight, durable-soft shell fabric, minimizing the use of 500d Cordura laminate. It features a laser-cut design with strong double and triple stitching.
Protection: It’s treated for water repellence and offers protection against night vision devices using NIR and IRR technology.
Weight: At 290 grams without plates, it’s notably lighter than the Spitfire.
Compatibility: Designed to carry most ballistic plates, including SAPI and swimmer cuts, it comes in sizes M and L.
PALS Slots: The PALS slots on the back have been improved for easier MOLLE-ing.
Zippers: The Bearcat uses the Crye Precision AVS standard zippers on the back, ensuring compatibility with various back panels.
Key Differences and Features
Front Plate Bag: Fully constructed from soft shell, with skeletonized PALS slots for reduced weight and easier mounting.
Velcro and Pouches: The Bearcat lacks Velcro for patches and built-in zipper pouches, unlike the Spitfire, to cut down weight.
Cable and Tube Management: The Spitfire's Velcro managers are replaced with more simple loops.
Side and Bottom Features: The Bearcat does not have slots for side wings or single-row pouches on the bottom like the Spitfire.
Shoulder Adjustment: The adjustment system on the shoulders has been changed. On the Spitfire, the adjustment is over the shoulders, allowing you to adjust while wearing it. The Bearcat's adjustment is underneath, preventing loosening but requiring you to remove the carrier to adjust.
Shoulder Velcro Loops: On the Bearcat, there are no longer Velcro loops on the shoulders like on the Spitfire.
Accessories Overview
New Accessories: The ultralightweight line features new accessory flaps like the 223/308 flap, quad SMG flap, shotgun shell flap, ultralightweight MOLLE panel, the skeletonized back panel, the underpouch Llght and the front flap rig interface.
My Personal Setup and Experience
I typically opt for the Ranger Green color due to its versatility in various environments. For ballistic protection, I use NIJ 3+ SAPI plates, and for added comfort, the Spitfire comfort pad set. My chosen cummerbund is the skeletonized cummerbund wide system, providing stability and potential for ballistic side panel upgrades.
My front setup includes the skeletonized triple rifle flap, accommodating various rifle magazines with excellent retention. On the left, I use a skeletonized comm wing set for my radio and a Direct Action Utility Pouch Small for essentials. The right side holds my tourniquet, though I'd prefer a clearer right side for pistol drawing. The Spitfire cutaway system allows quick disposal if needed, and a Spitfire backpack panel enhances my load carrying capcity.
Observations and Final Thoughts
After years of use, the Bearcat has shown minor wear but remains highly durable. Inserting ballistic plates is more challenging than with the Spitfire due to its less rigid construction. However, the Bearcat is extremely comfortable, especially with the Spitfire comfort pads.
In a basic setup, the Bearcat isn't significantly lighter than the Spitfire, particularly with my chosen cummerbund.
However, opting for ultralight accessories and slim cummerbunds can reduce weight significantly. Despite some compromises, like the lack of Velcro patches and slots, the Bearcat is a cost-effective, high-quality option.
Price Comparison
We did a price comparison between a full Spitfire system and a full Bearcat system. Both setups (plate carrier, cummerbund, front flap, and side wing for a radio) roughly have the same functionalities. The Bearcat is about 100 Swiss francs cheaper than the Spitfire, making it an attractive option for those seeking a high-quality, budget-friendly plate carrier.
Conclusion
The Direct Action Bearcat plate carrier offers a lightweight, customizable option for tactical needs. Its unique features and compatibility with various accessories make it a versatile choice. For more information and to purchase the Bearcat or Spitfire, visit Reconbrothers.com.
THANKS FOR READING!
Hopefully this blog was helpful for you. If you’re looking for these sort of products, accessories and much more cool stuff make sure to visit our webshop.
